FUNCTION WAR: AN EVALUATION OF ENCODE PROJECT AND JUNK DNA IN THE LIGHT OF PHILOSOPHY OF BIOLOGY
For decades, the standard textbook view of the human genome was a landscape dominated by vast tracts of non-coding, seemingly useless genetic material—the notorious "junk DNA." This concept was a cornerstone of molecular evolutionary biology, supported by observations like the C-value paradox, which noted the massive variation in genome size among eukaryotes without corresponding complexity. This paradigm was violently disrupted by the 2012 culmination of the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project. ENCODE’s bold, headline-grabbing claim that "80.4% of the human genome has a biochemical function" immediately ignited what has since been termed the "Function War," a profound conceptual battle that transcends experimental data and strikes at the heart of the philosophy of biology, specifically challenging fundamental tenets of the Modern Evolutionary Synthesis (MS). The core of this conflict lies not merely in measuring molecular activity, b...