Transcription Fidelity: New Paradigms in Epigenetic Inheritance, Genome Instability and Disease

The article, published in 2018, sheds light on a previously underappreciated aspect of gene expression: transcription fidelity. While traditionally viewed as a high-fidelity process, recent advancements have revealed that errors during RNA transcription, though fleeting, can have significant consequences for cellular health, disease development, and even evolution.

Key Points:

  • RNA Polymerase Errors: The DNA-to-RNA transcription process, facilitated by RNA polymerase, is not error-free. Errors like insertions, deletions, and substitutions can occur, albeit at lower rates than DNA replication. RNA polymerase error rates are reported to be >5,000-fold higher than DNA replication errors.


  • Beyond Point Mutations: Traditionally, mutations were understood as changes in the DNA sequence. This article highlights the role of transcription errors as a source of epigenetic variability, influencing gene expression without altering the underlying DNA code.

  • Epigenetic Inheritance: Transcription errors can create alternative RNA transcripts, impacting protein production and potentially leading to the inheritance of these altered gene expression patterns across generations.

  • Genome Instability: Frequent errors during transcription can contribute to genomic instability, increasing the risk of mutations and potentially driving cancer development.

  • Disease Associations: The article explores potential links between transcription infidelity and various diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and antibiotic resistance. It suggests that understanding these connections could lead to novel therapeutic strategies.

  • Evolutionary Implications: The authors propose that transcription errors might play a role in evolution, providing a source of phenotypic diversity and potentially accelerating adaptation under stress.

The Paradigm Shift:

This article challenges the traditional view of transcription as a highly accurate process. By highlighting the prevalence and potential consequences of transcription errors, it encourages a paradigm shift in our understanding of gene expression and its impact on health and evolution.

Methodological Advancements:

The ability to study transcription fidelity has benefitted from recent advancements in:

  • RNA library preparation: Techniques like single-cell RNA-seq allow researchers to examine errors at the individual cell level, revealing heterogeneity within populations.

  • Next-generation sequencing (NGS): High-throughput sequencing technologies enable the detection and quantification of rare transcription errors with greater accuracy.

  • Computational tools: Specialized software helps analyze vast amounts of sequencing data to identify and characterize error patterns.

Future Directions:

The authors identify several key areas for future research:

  • Mechanisms of error generation: Understanding the factors that contribute to transcription errors and how they vary across cell types and conditions is crucial.

  • Functional consequences: More research is needed to elucidate the impact of specific transcription errors on protein function and cellular phenotypes.

  • Developing therapeutic strategies: Targeting mechanisms that regulate transcription fidelity could offer new avenues for treating diseases associated with genome instability and aberrant gene expression.


Beyond DNA Polymerase: Transcription Errors Rewrite the Rules of Inheritance, Instability, and Disease

For decades, the "modern synthesis" of evolutionary theory has attributed genetic variation primarily to DNA polymerase errors during replication. However, the article "Transcription fidelity: New paradigms in epigenetic inheritance, genome instability and disease" challenges this dogma, unveiling a new frontier: transcription errors. This article argues that these seemingly transient glitches during RNA synthesis hold profound consequences for epigenetic inheritance, genome instability, and disease development.

While DNA polymerase errors are permanent, transcription errors are fleeting. Yet, their frequency is surprisingly high, and their impact is far from inconsequential. The authors highlight the emergence of powerful tools like next-generation sequencing, allowing researchers to finally quantify and study these errors in detail. This newfound ability opens a Pandora's box of previously unexplored mechanisms.

One key revelation is the link between transcription errors and epigenetic inheritance. These errors can lead to misincorporations in the RNA, potentially altering its ability to guide epigenetic modifications like DNA methylation. This opens a fascinating possibility: can environmental or stress-induced changes in transcription fidelity influence the epigenome across generations, even in the absence of DNA mutations?

Furthermore, the article delves into the connection between transcription errors and genome instability. Errors during RNA synthesis can destabilize the DNA template, leading to mutations, rearrangements, and increased risk of diseases like cancer. This challenges the traditional view of cancer as solely driven by DNA mutations, suggesting a more dynamic and error-prone process fueled by faulty transcription.

The implications are vast. The authors propose that transcription fidelity might be a crucial player in evolution and disease. It could explain the observed non-genetic heterogeneity within cell populations, contributing to drug resistance and metastasis in cancer. Additionally, it might shed light on complex disorders like aging and neurodegeneration, where environmental factors and epigenetic changes play a significant role.

In conclusion, "Transcription fidelity: New paradigms in epigenetic inheritance, genome instability and disease" ushers in a paradigm shift. It compels us to move beyond the limitations of the modern synthesis and recognize transcription errors as potent drivers of biological variation, disease development, and even evolution. This exciting new frontier promises to revolutionize our understanding of how organisms adapt, inherit traits, and succumb to illness, paving the way for novel therapeutic approaches and a deeper appreciation for the intricate dance between genes and their fleeting echoes in RNA.

Snippets

Transcription fidelity: New paradigms in epigenetic inheritance, genome instability and disease.

Ribosomes make translation errors at rates estimated between 10−2 and 10−6 per codon and are a source of non-genetic phenotypic variation.

transcription as a source of phenotypically relevant errors has been largely overlooked.

One goal of this review is to not only illustrate the importance of transcription errors, but also elucidate their potential to generate heritable change.

less is known about the biology of RNA errors.

Broadly defined, transcription errors, also known as “epimutations”, are sequence deviations from the DNA template that occur in nascent transcripts.

They are distinct from downstream RNA modifications and editing but can exert similar, and potentially functional, consequences on the heterogeneity of the protein pool.

Transcription errors stem from the inherently error-prone activity of DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RNAP) with error rates reported between 10−5 and 10−6 events per base, >5,000-fold higher than DNA replication errors.

Transcription factors, DNA damage, certain sequence motifs and the general genomic environment are all believed to modulate the frequency of transcription errors, in addition to external conditions (e.g. oxidative stress.

A class of proteins exists to enhance RNAP proofreading - so-called “RNA fidelity factors” - that together share a fascinating link to genomic stability, epigenetics, phenotypic heterogeneity, and cellular evolution through mechanisms under current investigation.

Transcription errors encompass both misincorporations and frameshifts, giving rise to point epimutations and indels, respectively.

Frameshifting errors tend to be more destabilizing to the RNA:DNA hybrid in the catalytic center of RNAP and thus are much less frequent (∼10−7 per base), with insertions outnumbering deletions.

Error rates vary greatly between species, polymerases, genes and even when comparing nascent to total RNA, the latter highlighting the importance of proofreading.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Complete Ape Genome Sequencing Recasts Genetic Similarity and Poses New Questions for Evolutionary Theory

“Redefining Evolution: Life Beyond the Limits of Neo-Darwinian Theory”- Review

The Tree of One Percent